Think Piece #1

Off to See the Wizard
a sister's reading of Oz

“Mandy,” I call out from my room. “I am reading something for school. Want to join me?” My eleven year old sister appears in my doorway within seconds, her face eager to hear what I am reading. “It's The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. You know, like the movie. I have to read it for school, but I want to read it with someone.” She crawls under the warm quilt with me as I reach my copy of Oz.

We first marvel at the classic cover, red inlaid with gold. She asks me how old the book is, and when I tell her that it was written in 1900, boredom crosses her face. I make an attempt to reassure her, not wanting her to dismiss the book before we had even reached the first page. Despite my wanting my sister to enjoy the book, I have my own reservations. I do not want this to be another boring assignment; I do not want to dread going to read it. With my sister tucked in next to me, though, I feel as if I may have a different perspective on reading for classes by the end of the book. The experience of reading with Mandy has just begun, and yet I already feel a magic in the air as we begin reading together.

I open to the first chapter hear myself read the first words. Page after page Mandy and I read together. When I begin the story my voice lacks character and inflection, but as I continue, I find myself transforming into the characters: sweet and young for Dorothy, high and tinny for the Tin Woodman, gruff and loud for the Cowardly Lion, and a bit dumbfounded for the scarecrow. Chapter after chapter Mandy and I join Dorothy for her journey down the yellow brick road.

The following week becomes an adventure in Oz. We spend every free moment reading together. We make a trip to the bookstore to buy another copy, so that we may each read the book while we are apart. We pay special attention to the illustrations and ask an employee for a copy of the one with “Denslow's pictures, please.” We spend a Saturday night watching the movie, and Mandy, who swears never to watch anything made before she was born, stays up far past her bedtime to reach the end of the film.

I finish the book first while on a lunch break at work. As I set the book down I realize that Oz has become so much more than an assignment to me. I have developed a kinship with the characters, and I find myself lingering through the pages long after I read the final words. I do not tell Mandy that I have finished, for I want to read the last bit again, this time with her. We finish the book together several days later. Mandy looks up at me when we are done to ask me what we can read next.

***

Through the reading of a children's book written more than a century ago Mandy and I developed a closer relationship as sisters and as lovers of reading.I have read a dozens of books to my sisters, but never before have we been so enrapt with a story and so excited about reading something aloud together. We were able to put down our technology and explore the world of Oz together. I wonder why such a thing became possible in a world where instant gratification and modern, fashionable young adult literature is prominent.

We were initially drawn to the experience of reading together. The act of hearing something be read aloud seems to bond the readers in a way that reading to oneself does not. To both me and Mandy, my voice becomes the voices of the characters, and the words on the page align in our hearts and memories of the book. We shared an experience that goes beyond reading a book and discussing it. No, we shared a handful of precious memories that will undoubtedly stay with us for a lifetime.

As we read the first few pages we were captivated by the illustrations. Though our book containing Denslow's illustrations only had pictures in black and white, they still were some of our favorite parts of the book. Mandy constantly took the book from my hands in order to look at the pictures up close and scrutinize the pictures of the characters. Denslow's pictures are whimsical and captivating. They encompass the imagination of a child. The illustrations do drive the story in a sense, for without them we would have been left to imagine every detail of the characters and the scenes of our own accord. The pictures themselves united me and Mandy, for we had the same mind pictures of what was happening. Instead of imagining things differently from the other in our mind's eye, we saw things the same way. Oz looked the same to both of us because of Denslow's drawings.

Just a few chapters in to the book the characters won our hearts. Dorothy, Toto, the Scarecrow, the Tin Woodman, and the Lion all became as friends to us. As a little girl herself Mandy related most to Dorothy, putting herself in the character's silver shoes. I placed myself in a more narrative position, seeing the characters move below me rather than being one of them. Even still I found myself breathless and nervous near the end of the story, hoping that Dorothy would somehow find a way back to Kansas. I grew tearful when she had to depart from her beloved friends, and Mandy kept repeating that “they should all go back to Kansas with her!”

Also it was the faraway land of Oz that kept us reading. Those moments in a land we could only imagine allowed us to escape the harsh realities of our world. Time stood still when we entered Oz. We became oblivious to everything around us and found ourselves stepping through a door into a magical land where nearly anything is possible. Our imaginations ran wild and free there, a place where we were allowed to dream big. Each time we picked up the book to read we were given the opportunity to explore the land of Oz. Because Oz was a fantastical place, a place created in the imagination of Frank Baum, we had an experience that was different from reading another more realistic work of fiction. The doors were wide open for us to learn and enjoy in this land of Oz. We had no preconceived notions about the setting or its characters. All was new to us allowing us to imagine and create this land together.

Our experience can not be attributed to just one of these reasons. Rather all of these things contributed to the overall experience we had. Reading aloud bonded us to the story and each other, the pictures allowed us to share our imaginations, the characters kept us engaged and interactive, and Oz provided the perfect backdrop for all of these wondrous events. All were key ingredients in a nearly surreal reading experience I was able to share with my little sister. I wish to hold these memories in my heart and bring similar elements to the reading I will share with my own children one day.

***

Notes: I watched the Jing videos Sherri sent me a few times before I revised this Think Piece. I cleaned up the areas that were confusing, and I more fully developed some of the ideas that I included, mainly my thoughts about the illustrations and the magical land of Oz. I also changed some of my wording and included a piece about my finishing the book with Mandy. Although I had the option, I chose not to include quotes from outside sources as I wanted to stay as close to my experience as I could and avoid turning my Think Piece into a research paper.

Read more...

Moodle Contribution #3

This Moodle post came about after the conference we attended at Western Washington University. Each individual person took away completely different things from the conference. The Moodle held two different discussions-one for those who liked Kirby Larson and one for those who preferred Chris Raschka. Although I personally preferred Kirby Larson, I began to think about why it was a good thing that we all disagreed.

Picture of Marcy Chipman
A fan of Kirby but not so much the other..
by Marcy Chipman - Monday, 7 March 2011, 12:39 PM
I loved what Kirby had to share! I was inspired with what she had to say about rewriting the books and just keepin on keeping on. I also got real scared about my own book and how I too have thought many times, the story sucks and I need to rewrite it.  I wanted to thank Kirby after the conference, so I ran up to the front where I was approached by a lady who tried to keep me from meeting Kirby.  I waited anyway, and got to shake Kiby's hand and thank her for making the reality of writing more of a reality.  On the other hand, Raschka was not as inspiring to me. It was interesting seeing his book of art, but I felt he went on and on. I got confused with all the different things he was talking about with his illustrations. He seems like a very complex person, whereas Kirby seemed more down to earth. Her openess was great! I thought she was honest and seemed humble.


Winnie the Pooh
Re: A fan of Kirby but not so much the other..
by Juliet Walsh - Monday, 7 March 2011, 12:41 PM
I have to agree with you about the authors that I am a fan of Kirby and liked Chis but felt that he drag on a bit in speaking, but really like how he told two of his stories.

Picture of Caitlin O'Callaghan
Re: A fan of Kirby but not so much the other..
by Caitlin O'Callaghan - Monday, 7 March 2011, 12:45 PM
Funnily enough, I feel the exact opposite way. I felt that Kirby dragged on a bit, and although down to earth as Grace said contridicted herself. I Didn't dislike her, but I just didn't appreciate her speech that much. Chris for me was inspiring, fun, interesting, and different. For me what he did was refreshing, we always hear stories of "how to get somewhere" but he didn't do that. Which I liked. Guess each author really just clicked differently with all of us.

Picture of Dana Carpenter
Re: A fan of Kirby but not so much the other..
by Dana Carpenter - Tuesday, 8 March 2011, 02:11 PM
Raschka did bring a different element.  And I agree with you: he was a pretty complex guy.  I did learn some interesting facts about illustrating and publishing from him so that was worth the price of admission.  I'm definitely a "Kirby fan" for all the reasons previously discussed here and in the classroom.

Picture of Patty  Roosma
Re: A fan of Kirby but not so much the other..
by Patty Roosma - Friday, 11 March 2011, 10:56 AM
I also loved what Kirby had to say!! While she was presenting i could not help but listen and take in what she had to say. When Raschka was speaking i did not get as much inspiration from him, he just seemed to go on and on not really saying much. Kirby brought a more personable feeling to her presentation.


Picture of Melissa Peacock
Re: A fan of Kirby but not so much the other..
by Melissa Peacock - Monday, 14 March 2011, 11:12 AM
I love that we all have such differing opinions about the conference. We are a diverse group of people, all with different thoughts and investments into children's literature. One of my very favorite things about this class is that we haven't been forced to fit into a certain mold or to pull out a certain lesson or philosophy from this class. Sherri told us at the beginning of the quarter that we will get out of the class what we put in. Some of us had put in things similar to Kirby's talk, while some of us have put in things similar to Raschka's work. I think the fact that we all took something unique from the conference adds to our learning experience as a whole. If we were all Kirby Larson groupies, we would lose the dimension of Raschka's work, and vice versa.
Just as the two authors were unique in their presentations, so are each of us. I took more away from Kirby's talk, but I believe that to be because I am more interested in young adult literature than children's books. I still greatly benefited from Raschka's speech as well as all of our discussions about his work.
This community of learning that we havd developed this quarter has been the catalyst for great discussions, even when we don't agree, sometimes especially when we don't agree. I so appreciate the diversity in our class.

Picture of Robin Martin
Re: I had a third reaction to the two speakers
by Robin Martin - Friday, 18 March 2011, 09:59 AM
I have found I enjoyed the book by Kirby Larson and I do like the art and stories by Raschka but I did not enjoy either of the presentations. I found Kirby too false personal and Raschka far too forced casual. The story parts of their talks were the parts that stood out for me. It seem they were having to push to fill up the time spot not give us insight into Children's Literature.

Read more...

Moodle Contribution #4

My final Moodle contribution comes from my response to Emily's Explorations report. I was inspired by what she had to say, but beyond that, I began to think about what I could do with the knowledge she shared. Emily's report is providing my jumping off place for my Explorations project next quarter. I took what she presented and made it my own.

Picture of Emily Pacheco
Explorations for Friday 3/11 (Emily's project)
by Emily Pacheco - Sunday, 6 March 2011, 10:26 AM
 
"As we share the words and pictures, the ideas and viewpoints, the rhythms and rhymes, the pain and comfort, and the hopes and fears and big issues of life that we encounter together in the pages of a book, we connect through minds and hearts with our children and bond closely in a secret society associated with the books we have shared. The fire of literacy is created by the emotional sparks between a child, a book, and the person reading. It isn't achieved by the book alone, nor by the child alone, nor by the adult who's reading aloud - it's the relationship winding between all three, bringing them together in easy harmony."

-Mem Fox, 
Reading Magic: Why reading aloud to our children will change their lives forever.

Picture of Melissa Peacock
Re: Explorations for Friday 3/11 (Emily's project)
by Melissa Peacock - Monday, 14 March 2011, 11:36 AM
 
Emily, I loved your Explorations report. Ever since your presentation I have not been able to stop thinking about those kids who are left behind when it comes to reading and how that can make a HUGE impact on them for the rest of their lives.
I would love to hear any thoughts or ideas any of you may have about how to prevent this. As I mentioned, our family does foster care, and the overwhelming majority of those children (we only have girls age five and under) have rarely, if ever, been read to. I love reading with our little girls, and they love being read to as well. That said, they are often very far behind, not just in reading, but in other areas (perhaps related to the lack of reading).
I am very concerned for these children. I wonder if there are any programs in Whatcom County that make a way for adults or college students to read to these kiddos. If there isn't, perhaps it is time for someone to start one. I know the library does reading time, but in my experience, getting the kids to the library is becoming the hard part. I am thinking about ways to essentially bring the books to the kids. It would be a tragedy to allow all of these bright kiddos to miss out on the world of reading because it was not accessible due to things not their fault whatsoever.
You have inspired me, Emily! I am seriously going to look into reading programs, and if there isn't one, I am going to look into what it would take to get one running. Thank you for the great presentation. I wouldn't have connected those synapses if not for you. ;)
Grey
Re: Explorations for Friday 3/11 (Emily's project)
by Scott Blume - Tuesday, 15 March 2011, 09:07 AM
 
Yes! Children's Librarians and Early Childhood Educators all agree that reading is the key. There are numerous programs to support that--The public library has a page dedicated to it:
http://www.bellinghampubliclibrary.org/children/Events/sixskillslinks.aspx
In my tenure, I found the problem was not finding willing volunteers but delivering the audience. How do we get to the kids who need help?

Read more...

Think Piece #2

Enjoying the Big Sky

As a little girl I found myself lost in tales of children, especially girls, who lived in the wild, wild west. I was captivated with tales of homesteading and of covered wagons. I spent many afternoons in my backyard dressed in the thrift store discards and faithful bonnet that made up my dress up box. My heroines were Laura Ingalls Wilder and girls like her. A thousand times I wished to go back in time so that I might live on the prairie with a checkered dress and sturdy brown boots, an clean white apron tied firmly around my waist.

Reading Hattie Big Sky as an adult, I found myself with the same feelings. I did not want to put the book down, and I found myself cheering Hattie along in her many pioneering challenges. I drove past farms and began to wonder what it would be like to hand fence the property. I dreamed of living in Hattie's time, of being a farmer myself. Though a decade has passed between my girlish fantasies and my reading of Hattie, I have not changed in my love for the stories. Through a conversation with my classmate Dana, I began to wonder why this is so. What captivates me about a time where survival was the order of the day? Why am I, a girl who appreciates pedicures and chai tea, drawn to stories about girls mucking around in fields and scaring off wolves?

I make a thousand thoughtless decisions each day, and I rush about from place to place, person to person without thinking. I wonder how my life would differ if I gave pause to the important. How would my life look differently if I valued a letter from a friend instead of reading it in a hurry and setting it aside, never to be touched again? How would my decisions be different if I had to spend days or weeks seeking out my options instead of rushing into things? What if I spent my free evenings reading with my sisters instead of holing up in my room? Would I be a happier, more fulfilled person?

Though I do not wish away my Macbook or my texting plan, I do long for a slower paced life. I blame my culture for forcing busyness on me. While that is partly true as a twenty-first century college student is expected to run from one thing to the next, I must take some of the blame myself. I find a security in my busyness, a status symbol of being wanted and needed.

Hattie did not have such luxuries. She did not have to make herself feel needed; she was needed for her very own survival. She did not have to feel the pull of culture telling her she was desired, for in order to keep her life on her property, she needed to work hard. Even then, though, despite her needing to slave away in order to accomplish her work, she still had the time to enjoy life's simple pleasures. She enjoyed games of chess, a summer afternoon beside a creek, and Perilee's delectable cooking. These things are almost entirely lost on me now. I never truly stop to enjoy the beautiful things; I instead hurry through life in order to be a successful, accomplished person. What kind of person will I be, though, if I never stop to take in the things right in front of me?

I was captivated by Hattie's story because I want to be Hattie. I didn't want to be a homesteader as much as I wanted to be one who appreciated the simple. Such a life is truly a romantic one, not for perfect men and for poetry, but for pouring oneself into life. Hattie grabbed every opportunity, every moment that came her way and clasped them tightly to her chest. I want a life like that. I want to live each day like that.

I cannot go homesteading in Montana or throw myself back to the early twentieth century, but Hattie's timeless values can still be replicated today. Perhaps they are even more valuable now because they are rare to be found. Hard work is not something to dread, but it is rather something to put one's pride into. Pausing to enjoy a patch of wildflowers, a glass of cool water, a clear blue sky, or a child's laugh are not wasted moments. John Lubbock said, “Rest is not idleness, and to lie sometimes on the grass under the trees on a summer's day, listening to the murmur of water, or watching the clouds float across the sky is by no means a waste of time.” Hattie worked hard in order to enjoy such pleasures. Even as I live a twenty-first century life, I can have a heart like Hattie's, one that loved deeply and enjoyed fully if I stop to relish the valuable moment, if I place a mark of sacredness around the truly important.

**

Notes: After I watched the Jing of Sherri's thoughts, I had no idea where to go. I liked some of the ideas in my original, but I did not know which ones to fully develop. The quote from Jon Lubbock was on my desktop, and when I saw it, my ideas were sparked. I had originally touched on Hattie enjoying the simple, but I realized I had been thinking much more about that topic. The simple life was essentially the reason I so enjoyed reading the book. I kept the first few paragraphs of the original, but eventually rewrote most of the rest. Although this version is a little messier, I prefer it much more than my first draft, for it is truly the result of my thinking about this topic.

Read more...

Moodle Contribution #1

This discussion involved The True Confessions of Charlotte Doyle. Our class had been having a debate about the book; some believed it to be great while some found it awful. This discussion branched off of that. Dana asked if this book was truly appropriate for children. At that time I was spending time thinking about the age appropriateness of children's literature. I felt as if our expectations for what children can read are too low. Some of my thinking has evolved since this post-I no longer think the majority of children's literature is "dumbed down"-but this is representative of my thinking at the beginning of the quarter.

Picture of Dana Carpenter
A book for children?
by Dana Carpenter - Tuesday, 25 January 2011, 03:16 PM

As I read this book, I find myself thinking "this is children's literature?"  Although Charlotte herself is a child, the vocabulary Avi uses seems more suited to adults.  Several phrases such as "my room was small, save a dresser" would make no sense to a child.  Or would it?  However, I'm not "writing it off" (no pun intended) just yet.  If it won a Newbury award, then there's a reason.
I'm really enjoying everyone's thoughts on this forum.  It's very civil and open.  Thanks for sharing.
Picture of Robin Martin
Re: A book for children?
by Robin Martin - Tuesday, 25 January 2011, 05:55 PM

Dana, I guess they are still considered children into the upper teens. I remember being beyond this by the 6th grade. If a young person dosen't get it then they need to ask questions or be reading more. We all gain knowledge the more we read. I'm afraid this sound kind of push on my part, sorry.
Picture of Melissa Peacock
Re: A book for children?
by Melissa Peacock - Wednesday, 26 January 2011, 08:25 PM

I have been thinking much this week about how dumbed down literature for children has become. I know we have discussed this some in class, but I can't seem to get it off my mind.

I was reading adult fiction by the time I was eleven. I wanted something deeper, more fulfilling than what children's and even young adult literature offered me.

That said, Charlotte Doyle provides a deep, refreshing alternative to the seemingly low standards we have placed on our children. I think kids are capable of reading and understanding more advanced things, but we keep those things from them for fear of their rejecting them-or worse yet, rejecting reading!

I think kids enjoy a challenge. I loved looking up new words, and my parents' friends often commented on my expanded vocabulary. Reading gave that to me. I am encouraged by this book, because I am realizing that there is some good fiction out there for kids-fiction that does expect a bit more from the reader. Maybe Charlotte Doyle is not the most in depth book ever written, but it provides a stepping stone for children to explore "harder" books.
Picture of Dana Carpenter
Re: A book for children?
by Dana Carpenter - Wednesday, 26 January 2011, 10:31 PM

You raise a good point about the "dumbing down" aspect.  It makes me wonder if the trend toward doing this with children's literature was to accommodate those who struggle with basic reading.  Authors and educators may have wanted reading to be fun and not a chore, hence the result was lowering the bar.
 I think back to being 8 years old and being bored with grade level books.  I had a teacher who nurtured my love of reading and gave me a pass to the intermediate library (grades 4-6)This is where I fell in love with "older" books like "Where the Lilies Bloom".  Now I wonder if Avi's book might fit in that category today. 
It sounds like you had a lot of support at home which encouraged your love for reading. 
Picture of Jason Miller
Re: A book for children?
by Jason Miller - Monday, 31 January 2011, 11:46 AM

I feel the same way. My mom read the Lord of the Rings trilogy and The Hobbit to me when I was little, so in a few years I began to try and tackle them. Kids can do a lot if they set their mind to it, the only challenge is making them interested.
And back in middle school, there were quite a few kids (though not near the majority) in my classes that had reading levels above their grade, and a few like me who had a college reading level.
I really think that the more you expect from them, the more they can show you (if they want to, but if they don't want to do well that's a different problem).
Steve Veldhuizen
Re: A book for children?
by Steve Veldhuizen - Monday, 31 January 2011, 12:07 PM

I guess they classify this book as children's lit is because Charlotte Doyle was 13. But the content was for an audience of young adults.

Read more...

  © Blogger template Shush by Ourblogtemplates.com 2009

Back to TOP